October 26. Just jotting this down very briefly: I want everyone to be able to think what they want and say what they think. With very few exceptions – as few exceptions as possible. With fewer exceptions than there are in Germany – one of the reasons why I am glad to be here.

Apart from the usual individual law – libel, slander, etc. – American law recognizes only the direct incitement to violence as an exception. To be considered direct, the targeted person must be physically present and the violence imminent.

There is a difference between what the law requires or allows, and what a university or organizer allows. That’s at their own discretion, but I’m always on the side of those who allow more and permit more.

I think that’s a major cultural achievement.

Why do I have this insane view that almost no one seems to share anymore, and that disqualifies myself as an unwelcome person? Because I myself have changed my beliefs several times in my life. Because all my beliefs seem so variable to me that I find it nonsensical, if not unjust, to be pegged down to any of them.

Because, moreover, I do not see how by forbidding someone to speak, one can change or even weaken their convictions. On the contrary, it makes those convictions stronger. And more aggressive.

Maybe it’s also because I studied philosophy and it is the most natural operation of my mind to construct arguments, to compare their structures, to question premises. I can experimentally switch sides in a conversation at any time, exaggerate an argument, think through the most unspeakable consequences without feeling guilty about it.

And I am continually amazed that most people apparently can’t do that, don’t do that, and don’t think it’s necessary.